ROI
Illustrative business case
Every number below is derived from assumptions you enter, using simple arithmetic that is listed in full. This is a planning model to structure a conversation — it is not a quote, a benchmark, or a guaranteed outcome.
Illustrative only. Figures are modelled from user-entered assumptions. They do not represent pricing, a commercial offer, or measured benchmark results, and should not be presented to a customer as such.
Assumptions
Replace these with the customer's own numbers.
Current platform cost
Model assumption
Model assumption
Model assumption
Model assumption
Data profile
Model assumption
Model assumption
Model assumption
Performance
Model assumption
Model assumption
Engineering effort
Model assumption
Model assumption
Model assumption
Incidents
Model assumption
Model assumption
Business impact assumptions
Model assumption
Model assumption
Model assumption
Model assumption
Future-state assumptions
Model assumption
Model assumption
Model assumption
Current annual cost
Illustrative output
$1,080,000
Modelled annual cost
Illustrative output
$350,377
Indicative year-one net
Illustrative output
$822,859
Indicative payback
Illustrative output
2 months
Current vs. modelled annual platform cost
Three-year view
Current-state cost grows at your stated rate; the modelled scenario grows more slowly because compression and pre-aggregation absorb part of the volume increase.
Benefit breakdown
Annual platform savings$729,623
Annual engineering effort recovered$153,393
Annual incident cost avoided$252,000
Annual business impact (your assumptions)$0
Three-year cumulative net benefit$5,001,876
Year-by-year
| Year | Current cost | Modelled cost | Savings | Other benefit | Cumulative net |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | $1,080,000 | $500,377 | $579,623 | $243,236 | $822,859 |
| Year 2 | $1,728,000 | $476,513 | $1,251,487 | $405,393 | $2,479,740 |
| Year 3 | $2,764,800 | $648,057 | $2,116,743 | $405,393 | $5,001,876 |
Every assumption in the model
- Storage cost divided by an assumed 4x compression factor.
- Compute cost divided by an assumed 2.5x efficiency factor from pre-aggregation.
- 58% of pipeline maintenance effort recovered, derived from the latency improvement ratio.
- 30% of incident cost considered addressable, scaled by the same latency ratio.
- Future-state volume growth assumed at 60% of current-state growth due to compression and rollups.
- Year one benefits discounted to 60% to reflect ramp, and include the one-time migration cost.
- All business-impact figures come directly from user-entered assumptions.